Mysterious radio bursts return
Опубликованно 27.08.2020 17:05
The phenomenon of Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) was first detected by Australian radio astronomers at the Parkes Telescope in 2007 (using archived data from 2001).
FRBs are a flare of electromagnetic energy, with the intensity of tens of millions of suns.
Since 2007 more than 100 have been identified.
FRB 121102 was one of the first discovered and the first to be localised, attracting attention after scientists noted it was responsible for repeated bursts.
Earlier this year, astronomers studying FRB 121102 were stunned to discover that not only were the radio bursts repeating, they could even figure out when they were likely to occur again.
Now it seems the FRB is following a cycle of between 156 and 161 days, in which the source of the bursts is silent for around 67 days, then a further 90-days when it wakes up and starts sending the radio signals again.
The short chirps are only around a millisecond long.
RELATED: Old NASA data finds 50 new planets
RELATED: ‘Sad, cold, lonely’ end to universe
RELATED: Stunning photos show surface of Mars
Earlier this year astronomers reported FRB 180916 was operating on a 16-day cycle of radio bursts, where the FRBs would be detected for four days before falling silent for 12.
A new preprint paper from researchers at Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy catalogues 36 bursts from FRB 121102 between September 2017 and June 2020 to identify July 9 and October 14 of this year as the active period for the source of the mysterious radio bursts.
A separate team of researchers at the National Astronomy Observatory of China were also monitoring the area and say the bursts have come from between March and August this year.
On August 17 they reported hearing a dozen bursts that seemed to confirm FRB 121102 was once again active.
The researchers in China arrived at a different conclusion however, theorising the active period would end between the end of August and September 9.
“Alternatively, if the source is continuously on after the projected turning-off time, it suggests that the putative period of the source is not real or has evolution,” research head Pei Wang said in a note on The Astronomer’s Telegram.
“We encourage more follow-up monitoring efforts from other radio observatories,” the researchers wrote.
Категория: Технологии